Learning
Experience 3: At the Courthouse
As part of my Business Law class with
Professor Naylor, I got the chance to go to a courthouse to attend a trail
hearing. Since I am fascinated about criminal cases, I chose to go to the
Criminal Court among the three options: Criminal Court, Civil Court, and Family
Law Center. However, I seemed to not have much luck with this court. I went to
the Criminal Court three times, paying for all of those Uber rides back and
forth a total of six times, going up and down stairs in the court, opening
every single door to see if there was any trial in process, yet failing to find
one. Unfortunately, all of the trial
on those day I decided to go were either pushed back, cancelled, or happen
later on during time I had to go back to TCU for class. However, not all of
those 10 hours running around in the courthouse are useless. While I was
hovering, I witnessed something beyond beautiful in the courtroom.
On the first time I went to the Criminal court, I sat in a
room and thought I was in a trial since everyone around me looked so nervous
and some of them were crying. To further reinforce my misunderstanding, a
lawyer approached when he figured out that I was a student who needed to write
a law report, telling me that it was a murder case (At this point I could feel
adrenaline ran through my veins) and he was telling all basic information I
need to know about the case. However, it was not a trial hearing; it was a 2
hours of the jury deliberating. So I sat there for two hours, waiting for the
jury to come out. At that point, I didn’t know exactly what a trial mean and
didn’t figure until after two hours of waiting that it was not the trial court that
I needed.
As I was about to leave, I saw the bailiff escorting some
criminals out, into the courtroom, so I decided to stay for a while to observe
what was going on. I saw the main judge started talking one-on-one with several
defendants in custody.
One of the criminals was a woman. With her grey hair, skin
and overall appearance, she looked as if she was in her thirties. But from the
spark of her eyes, I guessed that she was in her twenties, and that she may
look older because of the condition in jail. After the woman was escorted to
the court, facing the main judge, they started a conversation. As I listened to
their soft and small-volume conversation, I acknowledged that the woman was
asking the judge about her chance of re-entrance to the society and especially
about her education after her serving time. What made me surprised even more
was Judge Wisch’s response – a response so kind and so personal that had me
bewildered for minutes.
Judge Wisch talked to the woman very softly, as he raised up
a big cross on his desk. He talked about faith, and God, which was totally unexpected.
He told her the honest truth that she had to obey the law, but at the same
time, he encouraged her that she could be an inspiration for everyone else in
there with her maturity in life. As he felt her fear of going back to that dark
place, he encourage her to bravely face the jail because it had to be that way
no matter how harsh it could be. I admired how the judge responded to her
worries. I could feel that he was very sympathetic with her particular situation
and tried his best to instill a realistic hope in her. I think that that was
the smartest and kindest response. He gave her hope; he inspired her to do her
best in jail, yet he remained realistic. He was helping her and giving her the encouragement
that she needed at the time.
I walked out of court with a smile on face even though I was
exhausted after hours waiting for the juries. I would never imagine a judge
having a personal “pep-talk” to prisoners about religion and faith until that
day. Judge Scott Wisch was a real MVP that day, because what he did that day inspired
more people than he may have thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment